[Live-devel] Advice on per-message connection in RTSPClient & RTSPServer?
Ross Finlayson
finlayson at live555.com
Sun Nov 19 23:08:19 PST 2006
>Does the LIVE
>RTSPServer assume that a TCP disconnect means the client is gone?
At present, yes.
Unfortunately there are no near-term plans to fix this. Sorry. I
suggest modifying your client to not tear down the TCP connection
between RTSP commands (for the same session).
>Also I've noted in RFC2326 page 27:
>
>For the scheme "rtsp", a persistent connection is assumed,
> while the scheme "rtspu" calls for RTSP requests to be sent without
> setting up a connection.
>
>So, is it correct to use "rtsp" (and not "rtspu") for this?
No, this is a red herring. "rtspu" was intended to specify RTSP
(control) over UDP, rather than TCP. However, this was not really
fully defined in RFC 2326, and noone ever implemented it.
--
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
More information about the live-devel
mailing list