[Live-devel] Reg: MPEG2TS over UDP

[Ross Finlayson]

> We are currently implementing our RTSP client

I don't understand.  If you're implementing your own RTSP client, then why not have it use the standard RTP/UDP transport?  The overhead is negligible, and you get several benefits (including proper handling of reordered packets, and RTCP reception statistics) from using a standard transport.

But anyway, if you program your client to use a "Transport:" header with "RAW/RAW/UDP" as the transport in the RTSP "SETUP" command, then our LIVE555 RTSP server implementation will probably accept that (even though it returned "RTP/AVP" in the SDP response to the previous "DESCRIBE" command).  Because you're using a non-standard protocol, however, you can expect no further support from me on this.


Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/attachments/20121120/de579235/attachment.html>