<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Live-devel] compliance with what version of
RTSP RFC?</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message<br>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;<br>
<x-tab>
</x-tab>boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C74161.FFF8E736"<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font face="Arial"
size="-1"> </font></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font face="Verdana" size="-1"
color="#000000">Is the latest Live555 RTSP implementation written to
the RFC 2326 proposed standard dated April 1998 or to the draft update
to this RFC dated February 2004?</font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Our RTSP implementation is intended to comply with the "RTSP
1.0" specification: RFC 2326. This is the only version of
RTSP that is currently an Internet Standard.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>More recent Internet-Drafts - the latest of which is <<font
face="Lucida Grande" size="-4"
color="#000000"
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-14.<span
></span>txt</font>>, dated December 2006 (*not* February 2004 - the
link at www.rtsp.org is out-of-date) - define a newer version of RTSP
("RTSP 2.0"). This version has not yet been
standardized by the IETF; however, the final RFC for this will likely
be very similar to the latest draft. It is also very likely that
our code will be upgraded to support RTSP 2.0 sometime in the future
(as this may be needed to better support things like NAT traversal).
However, for now, RTSP 1.0 (RFC 2326) is what we support.</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
Ross Finlayson<br>
Live Networks, Inc.<br>
http://www.live555.com/</div>
</body>
</html>