<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Live-devel] LIVE releases / Products using
testProg p</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font size="-1">1. I hope it is not
unbecoming for me to inquire, but are you expecting to release any
significant trick mode changes in the next 2 weeks?
</font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>No, probably not. (At least, not to the server code.
I might add new options to "openRTSP" to support client
'trick mode' operations, because several people have been asking for
this.)</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font size="-1">2. I have noticed your
solutions which suggest piping between different LIVE555 test
applications. Do you believe or know for certain that software
products often use the LIVE555 in this way, rather than implementing
an application linked against the LIVE? </font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>If a data source is available as a file, or as a pipe, then it's
generally better (i.e., much simpler) to use it as such (using
"ByteStreamFileSource"), rather than writing your own new
"FramedSource" subclass that encapsulates the data.</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
Ross Finlayson<br>
Live Networks, Inc.<br>
http://www.live555.com/</div>
</body>
</html>