<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Live-devel] Possible bug in liveMedia + info
request</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Cristiano Belloni skrev:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><tt>I realize
H263plusVideoFileServerMediaSubsession is meant to send H263+<br>
streams, which it does, but I thought H263+ was backwards
compatible<br>
with H263.<br>
</tt><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>I'm sorry i cannot answer your full mail,
but the H263 and H263+ uses different<br>
format when it is sent over RTP</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>No, not necessarily. Note that H.263 *can* (and, in fact,
now *should*) be sent using the H.263+ RTP payload format (which is
what we implement in our code).</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Note the introduction to RFC 2429, which explains this.</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
Ross Finlayson<br>
Live Networks, Inc.<br>
http://www.live555.com/</div>
</body>
</html>