<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Live-devel] Detecting network
failure</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Ross
Finlayson <<a
href="mailto:finlayson@live555.com">finlayson@live555.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
> I should warn you that I consider the "DarwinInjector"
stuff to be<br>
> deprecated technology, and although I'll probably be upgrading it
to do an<br>
> asynchronous "ANNOUNCE", there's no guarantee that it
will continue to be<br>
> supported in the future. We have our own RTSP server
implementation, and<br>
> people should really be using this, rather than using this hack
along with<br>
> some other implementation.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Well, let me explain a few things to you
(you seem confused about why I'm doing this)</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Actually, I'm less "confused" than
"uninterested". Overall, in general, I'm just not
particularly interested in proxys (or 'middleboxes' in general).
While they're often useful, supporting them is generally not a high
priority for me.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>What alternate options to the
DarwinInjector do I have that would accomplish this with
Live555?</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Right now, nothing. In the future, though, I hope a
cleaner, more standard protocol for this will come available (perhaps
for RTSP 2.0).</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
Ross Finlayson<br>
Live Networks, Inc.<br>
http://www.live555.com/</div>
</body>
</html>