<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Ross Finlayson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:finlayson@live555.com">finlayson@live555.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div class="im">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote>I hope you realize, though, that JPEG is a very poor codec
for video streaming, because each frame is so large (and so takes up
many network packets). If *any* of these network packets gets
lost, then the whole frame must be discarded.</blockquote>
<blockquote><br></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">Thanks. I do realise that its a
poor codec but I want to generate a video stream of around 15Mbps and
JPEG seemed the easiest. Is there no way of sending the frame in
more packets so that there is no packet loss?</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
</div><div>??? If JPEG frames were packed into more packets, then
you'd be *more* likely to see packet loss (thereby resulting in the
loss of a JPEG frame).</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>However, you should also reread
<a href="http://www.live555.com/liveMedia/faq.html#packet-loss" target="_blank">http://www.live555.com/liveMedia/faq.html#packet-loss</a> This might
help you.</div><div class="im">
<div><br></div>
<pre><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: normal;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="monospace"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre;"><br></span></font></span></font></pre>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>OK. So could I stream over TCP rather than UDP?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Andy</div></div>