On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Ross Finlayson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:finlayson@live555.com">finlayson@live555.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I was also not able to find any public git or svn repository for live555. Could<br>
you consider to make one?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
No. We make available - and provide support for - the most recent version of the code only.<font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br>Just because you use source control doesn't mean you have to support any random release of the code. Almost no open source projects I know function this way; there are clear releases and supported versions. Is there some other reason you're opposed to public source code? It's really difficult not having a history of changes made (and a changelog is a poor substitute for source control history), or being able to roll back the library to a previous version to locate regression.<br>
<br>My $0.02: if you've gone this long without source control, then I don't expect you're about to change, but you should really reconsider this decision at some point. <br></div></div><br>