[Live-devel] Re: live-devel Digest, Vol 15, Issue 10

[Alex zhang]

Hi, ross
   you say that would rarely happen ,ok, i think so too, but i use the
"TestOndemondServer" to act as the server, but it happened everytime,
maybe you can check it. thanks!


> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:48:45 -0800
> From: Ross Finlayson <finlayson at live.com>
> Subject: Re: [Live-devel] SEEK handle patch
> To: "LIVE.COM Streaming Media - development & use"
>        <live-devel at ns.live.com>
> Message-ID: <6.2.0.14.1.20050113184537.03259280 at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> 
> >Under the environment that we do SEEKING operation, Is there any
> >necessaries to get the "bufferedPacket" cleared avoid some packet that
> >unhandled but leaving in the "ReorderingPacketBufferring"
> 
> Alex,
> 
> I could certainly do something like this, but I don't think it would be
> very useful.  There  will rarely be any extra incoming packet in the
> 'reordering packet buffer'.  That happens only if the last-received packet
> arrived out-of-order (or if the packet previous to the last-received packet
> got lost).  That's something that rarely happens.
> 
>        Ross Finlayson
>        LIVE.COM
>        <http://www.live.com/>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> live-devel mailing list
> live-devel at lists.live.com
> http://lists.live.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
> 
> End of live-devel Digest, Vol 15, Issue 10
> ******************************************
>