[Live-devel] question about sdp generation in ServerMediaSession and darwin
Dion Galbreath
DionG at viewcast.com
Thu Oct 8 10:54:24 PDT 2009
> >>We've been using the 2008.09. 1220313600 of live55 and everythings
> >>been dandy. We upgraded to 2009.09.04 1252022400 and seem to have
a
> >>problem with a darwin server. When we place the sdp file that is
> >>created with the live555 from 2009.09.04 1252022400 we can not
> >>connect to the stream on our darwin server. Using quicktime
> >>player[...]
>
> >OK, so the obvious question now (and the only question that should
> >concern us) is: What is different between these two SDP files (the
> >old one that works, and the new one that doesn't)?
[...]
>>
>>the biggest difference is in the sprop-parameter-sets= and the
>>number ontop in the 0=- I think the real issue is in the
>>sprop-parameter-sets=
>Well, that string is derived from whatever H.264 video stream data
>you used to generate the SDP description in the first place. If it's
>different between the two versions, it's because the video stream
>data was different (i.e., had different SPS and PPS NAL units)
>between the two.
>
>It's possible, though that the longer SDP 'session id' string in the
>new "o=" line is causing Darwin problems. The new, longer id is
>perfectly legal, but perhaps Darwin doesn't like it. You can test
>this by swapping the two "o=" lines and seeing what happens.
>--
>
>Ross Finlayson
>Live Networks, Inc.
>http://www.live555.com/
That is in fact the case. Swapping the two o lines worked.. any idea
why it might not like the longer session id?
Thanks
Dion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/attachments/20091008/d85bf406/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the live-devel
mailing list