[Live-devel] Patch request and question
Derk-Jan Hartman
hartman at videolan.org
Fri Jan 21 14:14:44 PST 2005
On 21 jan 2005, at 01:33, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> At 04:15 PM 1/20/05, you wrote:
>> http://www.dmn.tzi.org/ietf/mmusic/47/id/draft-sheedy-mmusic-rtsp-ext
>> -00.txt
>>
>> draft from nCUBE Corporation for their MediaCube VoD server platform
>> (see extract below)
>
> Thanks.
>
>>> 2.4 Transport/Profile/Lower-Transport Combinations
>>>
>>> Only the following combinations of protocols, profiles, and lower
>>> transports are meaningful:
>>>
>>> MP2T/H2221/AAL5-PVC
>>> MP2T/H2221/AAL5-SVC
>>> MP2T/DVBC/QAM
>>> MP2T/DVBC/ASI
>
> Hmm - However, this doesn't explain "M2TP/H2221/UDP". Perhaps this
> really is nothing more than MPEG-2 Transport Stream in raw UDP packets
> - i.e., the same as the "RAW/RAW/UDP" that we're currently testing
> for? Could Jason Davis (the person who started this thread) please
> check this? If so, we can just add "M2TP/H2221/UDP" to the existing
> "if" statement that checks for MPEG-2 Transport-over-raw UDP.
Well they probably just broke their own rules or something (it was a
2000 draft. i mean who knows? :) ), but indeed i suspect it's the same
as RAW/RAW/UDP 33
DJ
---
Universiteit Twente
Derk-Jan Hartman (d.hartman at student.utwente dot nl)
http://home.student.utwente.nl/d.hartman
More information about the live-devel
mailing list